1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2009 Holden Cruze is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Cruze (139 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Citroen CX (186 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 1976 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Cruze. 1976 Citroen CX has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Cruze has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Cruze will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Citroen CX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2009 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Cruze |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 139 HP |
Torque | 186 Nm | 176 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2685 mm |