1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | CX | Epica |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2700 mm |