1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Lexus GS
To start off, 2009 Lexus GS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lexus GS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus GS (246 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus GS should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus GS weights approximately 435 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lexus GS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lexus GS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus GS (294 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus GS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2009 Lexus GS | |
Make | Citroen | Lexus |
Model | CX | GS |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 246 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1305 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 71 L |