1976 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Volvo S60
To start off, 2009 Volvo S60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo S60 (258 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (128 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volvo S60 (350 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2009 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | S60 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2346 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 258 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |