1976 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,347 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Citroen CX (128 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Citroen CX weights approximately 25 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (197 Nm). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | CX | C30 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 128 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 197 Nm | 270 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1476 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3110 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |