1976 Citroen CX vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen CX would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX.
Because 2012 Ford F-350 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Ford F-350. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 362 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen CX | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | F-350 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2347 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 186 Nm | 548 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |