1976 Citroen LN vs. 1980 Volvo 265
To start off, 1980 Volvo 265 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen LN would be higher. At 2,315 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 265 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 265 (82 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1976 Citroen LN. (32 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 265 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 265 weights approximately 794 kg more than 1976 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 265 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 265. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen LN, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 265 (145 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen LN. (41 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 265 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen LN | 1980 Volvo 265 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | LN | 265 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2315 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 32 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 86.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 706 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 58 L |