1976 Citroen LN vs. 2006 Volvo S40
To start off, 2006 Volvo S40 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen LN would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo S40 (123 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 1976 Citroen LN. (32 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen LN.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo S40 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen LN. (41 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Citroen LN | 2006 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | LN | S40 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 32 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 41 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 74 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 70 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Top Speed | 120 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3390 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 55 L |