1976 Citroen LN vs. 2010 Volvo C30

To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Citroen LN would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 195 more horse power than 1976 Citroen LN. (32 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen LN. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C30 weights approximately 747 kg more than 1976 Citroen LN. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 279 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen LN. (41 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen LN.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Citroen LN 2010 Volvo C30
Make Citroen Volvo
Model LN C30
Year Released 1976 2010
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 602 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type boxer in-line
Horse Power 32 HP 227 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 1500 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 706 kg 1453 kg
Vehicle Length 3390 mm 4265 mm
Vehicle Width 1530 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2240 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 60 L