1976 DAF 46 vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 DAF 46. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 DAF 46 would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1976 DAF 46. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 DAF 46. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1976 DAF 46. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 DAF 46 | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 46 | 3 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 844 cc | 1595 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 765 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
