1976 Daihatsu Charmant vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1976 Daihatsu Charmant is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1976 Daihatsu Charmant. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1976 Daihatsu Charmant. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 150 kg more than 1976 Daihatsu Charmant. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Daihatsu Charmant. (90 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Daihatsu Charmant.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Daihatsu Charmant | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Charmant | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1976 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1164 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 57 L |