1976 Daihatsu Delta vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Daihatsu Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Daihatsu Delta would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1976 Daihatsu Delta. (85 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1976 Daihatsu Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Acura CSX weights approximately 238 kg more than 1976 Daihatsu Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Daihatsu Delta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Daihatsu Delta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura CSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Daihatsu Delta | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Daihatsu | Acura |
Model | Delta | CSX |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1588 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2700 mm |