1976 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2003 Ford Model U
To start off, 2003 Ford Model U is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2003 Ford Model U. (149 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Model U.
Because 2003 Ford Model U is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Model U will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Model U. (213 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Model U.
Compare all specifications:
1976 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2003 Ford Model U | |
Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
Model | Longchamp | Model U |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 213 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1660 mm |