1976 Dodge Aspen vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1976 Dodge Aspen is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Dodge Aspen (100 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 315 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Dodge Aspen | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Aspen | 2000 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 117.5 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2700 mm |