1976 Dodge Aspen vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1976 Dodge Aspen is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Dodge Aspen (101 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1968 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Dodge Aspen should accelerate faster than 1968 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 295 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1976 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1976 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Dodge Aspen | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Aspen | 2000 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |