1976 Dodge Aspen vs. 2006 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2006 Mazda B3000 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,686 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1976 Dodge Aspen. (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 1976 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 55 kg more than 2006 Mazda B3000.
Because 1976 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda B3000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 244 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Dodge Aspen | 2006 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Aspen | B3000 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2006 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3686 cc | 2966 cc |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3200 mm |