1976 Dodge Aspen vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1976 Dodge Aspen. (101 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 102 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3.

Because 1976 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1976 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Dodge Aspen 2010 Mazda 3
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Aspen 3
Year Released 1976 2010
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3687 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 101 HP 167 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 231 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 1600 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 1363 kg
Vehicle Length 5020 mm 4506 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2639 mm