1976 Fiat 128 vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1976 Fiat 128 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Zastava 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 108 kg more than 1976 Fiat 128.
Because 1968 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Fiat 128 | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | 128 | 1300 |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1295 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1550 mm |
