1976 Fiat 128 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Fiat 128 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1976 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1976 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Fiat 128 weights approximately 56 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.
Because 2010 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Fiat 128 | 2010 Smart ForTwo | |
| Make | Fiat | Smart |
| Model | 128 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1116 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 876 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1560 mm |
