1976 Fiat 133 vs. 1999 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Toyota Celica is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,792 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Toyota Celica (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1976 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1976 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Celica weights approximately 400 kg more than 1976 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Toyota Celica (172 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Fiat 133 | 1999 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Fiat | Toyota |
| Model | 133 | Celica |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 843 cc | 1792 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 172 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 690 kg | 1090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2510 mm |
