1976 Fiat 133 vs. 2009 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2009 Ford Mustang is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Mustang (395 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1976 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1976 Fiat 133.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Mustang (240 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Fiat 133. (54 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Fiat 133 | 2009 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 133 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 843 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 395 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3460 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2740 mm |
