1976 Ford Cortina vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1976 Ford Cortina. (56 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 30 kg more than 1976 Ford Cortina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Cortina. (91 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Cortina. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1976 Ford Cortina has manual transmission. 1976 Ford Cortina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Cortina | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Cortina | Smart |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1298 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 91 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 63 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |