1976 Ford Fairlane vs. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW
To start off, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Fairlane (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mitsubishi SUW weights approximately 453 kg more than 1976 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1976 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi SUW, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Fairlane (328 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW. (240 Nm). This means 1976 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mitsubishi SUW.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Ford Fairlane | 1999 Mitsubishi SUW | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Fairlane | SUW |
| Year Released | 1976 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1099 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2630 mm |
