1976 Ford Fairlane vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Fairlane (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (78 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 468 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Fairlane (328 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Ford Fairlane | 2002 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Ford | Renault |
| Model | Fairlane | Clio |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1461 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 78 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 328 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 18.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 984 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |
