1976 Ford Fairlane vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Fairlane (155 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Renault Scenic. (133 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 318 kg more than 1976 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1976 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Fairlane (328 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (99 Nm). This means 1976 Ford Fairlane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Fairlane | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Fairlane | Scenic |
Year Released | 1976 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3984 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 328 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1770 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2710 mm |