1976 Ford Falcon vs. 1966 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1976 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 1966 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1966 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1043 kg more than 1966 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 1966 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Ford | Lotus |
Model | Falcon | Seven |
Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 238 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 432 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2240 mm |