1976 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2000 Holden Commodore is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2000 Holden Commodore. (197 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2000 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Holden Commodore weights approximately 135 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (422 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Commodore. (304 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Commodore.

Compare all specifications:

1976 Ford Falcon 2000 Holden Commodore
Make Ford Holden
Model Falcon Commodore
Year Released 1976 2000
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4942 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 238 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 422 Nm 304 Nm
Torque RPM 2600 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1475 kg 1610 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5050 mm
Vehicle Width 1910 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2950 mm