1976 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2009 Renault Koleos is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (256 HP) has 87 more horse power than 2009 Renault Koleos. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Koleos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Renault Koleos weights approximately 65 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 2009 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Renault Koleos has automatic transmission and 1976 Ford Falcon has manual transmission. 1976 Ford Falcon will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Renault Koleos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 2009 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Falcon | Koleos |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |