1976 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Aston Martin One-77
To start off, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2010 Aston Martin One-77 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 HP) has 494 more horse power than 1976 Ford Falcon. (256 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Aston Martin One-77 weights approximately 45 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Aston Martin One-77 (750 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Falcon. (491 Nm). This means 2010 Aston Martin One-77 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 2010 Aston Martin One-77 | |
Make | Ford | Aston Martin |
Model | Falcon | One-77 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 7300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 750 HP |
Torque | 491 Nm | 750 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1630 kg |