1976 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi TT (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1976 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Falcon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi TT (350 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Falcon. (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Falcon | TT |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 350 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2469 mm |