1976 Ford Falcon vs. 2010 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (148 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1976 Ford Falcon. (129 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 5008, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 5008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Falcon. (263 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Falcon | 2010 Peugeot 5008 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Falcon | 5008 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 263 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1835 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2735 mm |