1976 Ford Granada vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Granada would be higher. At 3,272 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1976 Ford Granada. (74 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1976 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Granada weights approximately 49 kg more than 2002 Volvo XC90.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Granada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Granada. (197 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Granada | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Granada | XC90 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3272 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 197 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |