1976 Ford Taunus vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1976 Ford Taunus.
Because 1976 Ford Taunus is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Taunus. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Taunus. (92 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Taunus.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Taunus | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Ford | Rover |
Model | Taunus | 75 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 92 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1120 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 65 L |