1976 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 730 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Because 1976 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Ford Thunderbird | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Ford | Suzuki |
| Model | Thunderbird | Covie |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 1530 mm |
