1976 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2008 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | LR2 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 3201 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2180 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2670 mm |