1976 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2010 Dodge Ram is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Ram weights approximately 480 kg more than 1976 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2010 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Thunderbird | Ram |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 391 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3560 mm |