1976 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 514 kg more than 1976 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1976 Ford Thunderbird has automatic transmission and 2013 Cadillac CTS-V has manual transmission. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1976 Ford Thunderbird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | Ford | Cadillac |
| Model | Thunderbird | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4186 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1994 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1884 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1422 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2880 mm |
