1976 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 449 kg more than 1976 Ford Thunderbird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Ford Thunderbird | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Ford | Dodge |
Model | Thunderbird | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 464 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3052 mm |