1976 GAZ 24 vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 GAZ 24. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 GAZ 24 would be higher. At 2,443 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 GAZ 24 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1976 GAZ 24. (93 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 GAZ 24. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 GAZ 24 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2012 Mazda 3.
Because 1976 GAZ 24 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 GAZ 24. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1976 GAZ 24 has manual transmission. 1976 GAZ 24 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 GAZ 24 | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | GAZ | Mazda |
Model | 24 | 3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2443 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1520 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2639 mm |