1976 Holden Belmont vs. 2002 Samsung SM5
To start off, 2002 Samsung SM5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 2,834 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Samsung SM5 (122 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1976 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Samsung SM5 should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Belmont. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Belmont weights approximately 5 kg more than 2002 Samsung SM5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Belmont (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Samsung SM5. (162 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1976 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Samsung SM5.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Holden Belmont | 2002 Samsung SM5 | |
Make | Holden | Samsung |
Model | Belmont | SM5 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 1838 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 162 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2710 mm |