1976 Holden Belmont vs. 2012 Lotus Evora
To start off, 2012 Lotus Evora is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lotus Evora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lotus Evora (276 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1976 Holden Belmont. (116 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lotus Evora should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Belmont.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lotus Evora (349 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Holden Belmont. (228 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Lotus Evora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Holden Belmont.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Holden Belmont | 2012 Lotus Evora | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Belmont | Evora |
Year Released | 1976 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2834 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4341 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1222 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2576 mm |