1976 Holden Statesman vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Statesman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Statesman would be higher. At 5,040 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Holden Statesman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Holden Statesman (238 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Holden Statesman should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Statesman weights approximately 246 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Holden Statesman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Statesman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Statesman (427 Nm) has 310 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1976 Holden Statesman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.

Compare all specifications: