1976 Holden Sunbird vs. 2013 Honda Fit
To start off, 2013 Honda Fit is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Sunbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Sunbird would be higher. At 2,832 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Holden Sunbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Honda Fit (115 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1976 Holden Sunbird. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Sunbird.
Because 1976 Holden Sunbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Sunbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda Fit, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Sunbird (224 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda Fit. (144 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1976 Holden Sunbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda Fit.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Holden Sunbird | 2013 Honda Fit | |
Make | Holden | Honda |
Model | Sunbird | Fit |
Year Released | 1976 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2832 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4105 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2500 mm |