1976 Holden Torana vs. 2002 Honda Acty
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,897 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1976 Holden Torana. (102 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1976 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Torana weights approximately 270 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1976 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Holden Torana (156 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1976 Holden Torana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Holden Torana | 2002 Honda Acty | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | Torana | Acty |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1897 cc | 660 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 139 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 840 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2460 mm |
