1976 Holden Torana vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Torana would be higher. At 1,256 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Holden Torana is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Holden Torana weights approximately 65 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi eK.
Because 1976 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1976 Holden Torana has manual transmission. 1976 Holden Torana will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1976 Holden Torana | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Torana | eK |
| Year Released | 1976 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1256 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 790 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2350 mm |
