1976 Holden Torana vs. 2011 Nissan Leaf
To start off, 2011 Nissan Leaf is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Holden Torana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Holden Torana would be higher.
Because 1976 Holden Torana is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Holden Torana. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Leaf, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Holden Torana | 2011 Nissan Leaf | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | Torana | Leaf |
Year Released | 1976 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4445 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2700 mm |