1976 Humber Sceptre vs. 2009 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Humber Sceptre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Humber Sceptre would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (235 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1976 Humber Sceptre. (82 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1976 Humber Sceptre.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Humber Sceptre. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-7 (351 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Humber Sceptre. (124 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Humber Sceptre.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Humber Sceptre | 2009 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Humber | Mazda |
Model | Sceptre | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1725 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 124 Nm | 351 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81.5 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.6 mm | 94 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 69 L |