1976 Lada 1200 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2003 Mazda 3 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1976 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1976 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 3 weights approximately 292 kg more than 1976 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Lada 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Lada 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 3 (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Lada 1200. (87 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Lada 1200. 2003 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 1976 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1976 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Lada 1200 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | 1200 | 3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 87 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 948 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 55 L |