1976 Lamborghini Urraco vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Colt

To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Lamborghini Urraco. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Lamborghini Urraco would be higher. At 2,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Lamborghini Urraco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (260 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lamborghini Urraco weights approximately 250 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1976 Lamborghini Urraco is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Lamborghini Urraco. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lamborghini Urraco (273 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt. (138 Nm). This means 1976 Lamborghini Urraco will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Colt.

Compare all specifications: