1976 Lancia Beta vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1976 Lancia Beta is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Lancia Beta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Lancia Beta (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1976 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Lancia Beta weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Lancia Beta (176 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1976 Lancia Beta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Lancia Beta | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Lancia | Riley |
Model | Beta | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1976 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2380 mm |